← All Models

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.2 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads in 5 of 8 categories

Arena ELO

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Cheaper

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Faster

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Detailed Comparison

CategoryGemini 2.5 ProGemini 3.2 Flash
ProviderGoogle Google
Context Window1M WIN128K
Input Price ($/1M)$1.25 WINN/A
Output Price ($/1M)$10 WINN/A
Arena ELO1360 WINN/A
Coding75.6% LiveCodeBench N/A
Reasoning84.6% GPQA Diamond N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)~60 t/s WINN/A
Open SourceNo No

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemini 3.2 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 75.6% LiveCodeBench on coding benchmarks, while Gemini 3.2 Flash scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M context, while Gemini 3.2 Flash supports 128K.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemini 3.2 Flash open source?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is proprietary. Gemini 3.2 Flash is proprietary.

Related Articles

Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…

Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap

Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line

Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move

Gemini 3.5 Flash lets you script computer use

Xcode 26.6 Adds Gemini to Apple’s AI Coding Stack

More Comparisons

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 4 ScoutGemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3.6Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Fable 5Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGemini 2.5 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 FlashGemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Llama 4 ScoutGemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Qwen 3.6Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Fable 5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGemini 3.2 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash