Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads in 3 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Cheaper
Qwen 3.6
Faster
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Context Window | 1M WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $1.25 | $0.2 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $10 | $0.8 WIN |
| Arena ELO | 1458 WIN | N/A |
| Coding | 75.6% LiveCodeBench | N/A |
| Reasoning | 84.6% GPQA Diamond | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~60 t/s WIN | N/A |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3.6?
Qwen 3.6 is approximately 91% cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3.6?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 75.6% LiveCodeBench on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3.6 scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M context, while Qwen 3.6 supports 128K.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3.6 open source?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is proprietary. Qwen 3.6 is open source.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 4 ScoutGemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-5.2Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4oGemini 2.5 Pro vs DeepSeek R1Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.6Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3.6 vs GLM-5.2Qwen 3.6 vs GPT-4oQwen 3.6 vs DeepSeek R1Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.6