Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3 235B
Qwen 3 235B leads in 4 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Qwen 3 235B
Cheaper
Qwen 3 235B
Faster
Qwen 3 235B
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen 3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Context Window | 1M WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $1.25 | $0.86 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $10 | $2 WIN |
| Arena ELO | 1360 | 1422 WIN |
| Coding | 75.6% LiveCodeBench | 70.7% LiveCodeBench |
| Reasoning | 84.6% GPQA Diamond | 2056 CodeForces ELO |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~60 t/s | ~65 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 235B?
Qwen 3 235B is approximately 75% cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 235B?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 75.6% LiveCodeBench on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench.
Which has a larger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M context, while Qwen 3 235B supports 128K.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 235B open source?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is proprietary. Qwen 3 235B is open source.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Qwen 3 235B ranks higher with ELO 1422 vs 1360.
Related Articles
Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…
Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap
Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line
Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move
Gemini 3.5 Flash lets you script computer use
Xcode 26.6 Adds Gemini to Apple’s AI Coding Stack