Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen 3 235B
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads in 5 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Cheaper
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Faster
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen 3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Context Window | 1M WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.1 WIN | $0.86 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $0.4 WIN | $2 |
| Arena ELO | 1492 WIN | 1422 |
| Coding | unknown | 70.7% LiveCodeBench |
| Reasoning | unknown | 2056 CodeForces ELO |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~200 t/s WIN | ~65 t/s |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen 3 235B?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is approximately 83% cheaper than Qwen 3 235B per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen 3 235B?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench.
Which has a larger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite supports 1M context, while Qwen 3 235B supports 128K.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen 3 235B open source?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is proprietary. Qwen 3 235B is open source.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite ranks higher with ELO 1492 vs 1422.
Related Articles
Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…
Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap
Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line
Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move
Gemini 3.5 Flash lets you script computer use
Xcode 26.6 Adds Gemini to Apple’s AI Coding Stack