Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GPT-4o
GPT-4o leads in 4 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
GPT-4o
Cheaper
GPT-4o
Faster
GPT-4o
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Gemini 3.2 Flash | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | N/A | $2.5 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | N/A | $10 WIN |
| Arena ELO | N/A | 1340 WIN |
| Coding | N/A | 30.8% SWE-bench |
| Reasoning | N/A | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | ~100 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | No | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.2 Flash or GPT-4o?
Gemini 3.2 Flash scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench.
Which has a larger context window?
Gemini 3.2 Flash supports 128K context, while GPT-4o supports 128K.
Is Gemini 3.2 Flash or GPT-4o open source?
Gemini 3.2 Flash is proprietary. GPT-4o is proprietary.
Related Articles
Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…
Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap
Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line
Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move
Gemini 3.5 Flash lets you script computer use
Xcode 26.6 Adds Gemini to Apple’s AI Coding Stack
More Comparisons
Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Llama 4 ScoutGemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Qwen 3.6Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Fable 5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGemini 3.2 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 FlashGPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-4o vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6GPT-4o vs Claude Fable 5GPT-4o vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-4o vs DeepSeek V4 Flash