Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GPT-5.3-Codex
GPT-5.3-Codex leads in 2 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Tie
Cheaper
GPT-5.3-Codex
Faster
Tie
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Gemini 3.2 Flash | GPT-5.3-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | N/A | $1.75 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | N/A | $14 WIN |
| Arena ELO | N/A | N/A |
| Coding | N/A | N/A |
| Reasoning | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | N/A |
| Open Source | No | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has a larger context window?
Gemini 3.2 Flash supports 128K context, while GPT-5.3-Codex supports 128K.
Is Gemini 3.2 Flash or GPT-5.3-Codex open source?
Gemini 3.2 Flash is proprietary. GPT-5.3-Codex is proprietary.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Llama 4 ScoutGemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GLM-5.2Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Qwen 3.6Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GPT-4oGemini 3.2 Flash vs DeepSeek R1GPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-5.3-Codex vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.3-Codex vs GLM-5.2GPT-5.3-Codex vs Qwen 3.6GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-4oGPT-5.3-Codex vs DeepSeek R1