← All Models

Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Grok 4

Grok 4 leads in 5 of 8 categories

Arena ELO

Grok 4

Cheaper

Grok 4

Faster

Grok 4

Detailed Comparison

CategoryGemini 3.2 FlashGrok 4
ProviderGoogle xAI
Context Window128K 256K WIN
Input Price ($/1M)N/A $5 WIN
Output Price ($/1M)N/A $25 WIN
Arena ELON/A 1330 WIN
CodingN/A unknown
ReasoningN/A unknown
Speed (tokens/sec)N/A ~45 t/s WIN
Open SourceNo No

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.2 Flash or Grok 4?

Gemini 3.2 Flash scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while Grok 4 scores unknown.

Which has a larger context window?

Gemini 3.2 Flash supports 128K context, while Grok 4 supports 256K.

Is Gemini 3.2 Flash or Grok 4 open source?

Gemini 3.2 Flash is proprietary. Grok 4 is proprietary.

Related Articles

Grok 4.5’s rise comes down to 5 numbers

Grok 4.5 turns agent work into one prompt

Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…

Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap

Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line

Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move

More Comparisons

Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Llama 4 ScoutGemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Qwen 3.6Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Fable 5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGemini 3.2 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5Grok 4 vs Llama 4 ScoutGrok 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Grok 4 vs Qwen 3.6Grok 4 vs Claude Fable 5Grok 4 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGrok 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash