GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4o
GPT-4o leads in 4 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
GPT-4o
Cheaper
GPT-4o
Faster
GPT-4o
Detailed Comparison
| Category | GLM-5.2 | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $3 | $2.5 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $80 | $10 WIN |
| Arena ELO | N/A | 1285 WIN |
| Coding | N/A | 30.8% SWE-bench |
| Reasoning | N/A | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | ~100 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or GPT-4o?
GPT-4o is approximately 85% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or GPT-4o?
GLM-5.2 scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench.
Which has a larger context window?
GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while GPT-4o supports 128K.
Is GLM-5.2 or GPT-4o open source?
GLM-5.2 is open source. GPT-4o is proprietary.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutGLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek V3.2GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-4o vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6GPT-4o vs DeepSeek R1GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.6GPT-4o vs DeepSeek V3.2