Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 在 3 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.6
價格較低
DeepSeek V3.2
速度較快
DeepSeek V3.2
詳細比較
| 類別 | Claude Opus 4.6 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Context Window | 1M 勝出 | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 | $0.27 勝出 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 | $1.1 勝出 |
| Arena ELO | 1549 勝出 | 1380 |
| Coding | 80.8% SWE-bench | unknown |
| Reasoning | 65.4% Terminal-Bench | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~40 t/s | ~80 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V3.2?
DeepSeek V3.2 is approximately 95% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V3.2?
Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while DeepSeek V3.2 scores unknown.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while DeepSeek V3.2 supports 128K.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V3.2 open source?
Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. DeepSeek V3.2 is open source.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher with ELO 1549 vs 1380.
相關文章
更多比較
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash