← 全部模型

Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4

Claude Opus 4.6 在 3 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

Claude Opus 4.6

價格較低

DeepSeek V4

速度較快

Claude Opus 4.6

詳細比較

類別Claude Opus 4.6DeepSeek V4
ProviderAnthropic DeepSeek
Context Window1M 勝出128K
Input Price ($/1M)$5 $0.435 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)$25 $0.87 勝出
Arena ELO1549 勝出N/A
Coding80.8% SWE-bench N/A
Reasoning65.4% Terminal-Bench N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)~40 t/s 勝出N/A
Open SourceNo Yes

常見問題

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V4?

DeepSeek V4 is approximately 96% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 per million tokens.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V4?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while DeepSeek V4 scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while DeepSeek V4 supports 128K.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V4 open source?

Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. DeepSeek V4 is open source.

相關文章

Anthropic extends Claude Fable access after GPT-5.6

Claude's J-space is not consciousness, but it matters

Claude Code MCP setup that connects real tools

Claude Reflect turns usage into retention

Claude Code’s backdoor scare points to 4 real risks

Anthropic’s Claude Skills define the new agent toolkit

更多比較

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek V4 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V4 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V4 vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V4 vs Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V4 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek V4 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash