← 全部模型

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K3

兩個模型整體表現接近

Arena ELO

Claude Opus 4.8

價格較低

Kimi K3

速度較快

平手

詳細比較

類別Claude Opus 4.8Kimi K3
ProviderAnthropic Moonshot AI
Context Window200K 勝出128K
Input Price ($/1M)$5 $0.6 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)$25 $2.5 勝出
Arena ELO1580 勝出N/A
CodingN/A N/A
ReasoningN/A N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)N/A N/A
Open SourceNo Yes

常見問題

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is approximately 90% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.8 supports 200K context, while Kimi K3 supports 128K.

Is Claude Opus 4.8 or Kimi K3 open source?

Claude Opus 4.8 is proprietary. Kimi K3 is open source.

相關文章

Kimi K3 Benchmark Evaluation Guide for Coding Agents

Kimi K3 Proves Intelligence Still Costs Too Much

Kimi K3 could pressure the middle tier of AI models

Claude Code turns chat into terminal work

Kimi K3 turns model hype into harness work

Kimi API quickstart adds K2.7 Code and Highspeed

更多比較

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashClaude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Fable 5Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.5Kimi K3 vs Llama 4 ScoutKimi K3 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.6Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeKimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashKimi K3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Kimi K3 vs Claude Fable 5