DeepSeek R1 vs GLM-5.2
DeepSeek R1 在 4 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
DeepSeek R1
價格較低
DeepSeek R1
速度較快
DeepSeek R1
詳細比較
| 類別 | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.55 勝出 | $3 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $2.19 勝出 | $80 |
| Arena ELO | 1368 勝出 | N/A |
| Coding | unknown | N/A |
| Reasoning | #1 Math & Coding Arena | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~45 t/s 勝出 | N/A |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or GLM-5.2?
DeepSeek R1 is approximately 97% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek R1 or GLM-5.2?
DeepSeek R1 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while GLM-5.2 scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
DeepSeek R1 supports 128K context, while GLM-5.2 supports 128K.
Is DeepSeek R1 or GLM-5.2 open source?
DeepSeek R1 is open source. GLM-5.2 is open source.
相關文章
更多比較
DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek R1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-4oDeepSeek R1 vs Claude Opus 4.6DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V3.2GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutGLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4oGLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek V3.2