← 全部模型

DeepSeek R1 vs GLM-5.2

兩個模型整體表現接近

Arena ELO

DeepSeek R1

價格較低

GLM-5.2

速度較快

DeepSeek R1

詳細比較

類別	DeepSeek R1	GLM-5.2
Provider	DeepSeek	Z.ai
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	N/A	$1.4 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)	N/A	$4.4 勝出
Arena ELO	1310 勝出	N/A
Coding	unknown	N/A
Reasoning	#1 Math & Coding Arena	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	~45 t/s 勝出	N/A
Open Source	Yes	Yes

常見問題

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek R1 or GLM-5.2?

DeepSeek R1 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while GLM-5.2 scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

DeepSeek R1 supports 128K context, while GLM-5.2 supports 128K.

Is DeepSeek R1 or GLM-5.2 open source?

DeepSeek R1 is open source. GLM-5.2 is open source.

相關文章

DeepSeek V4 Flash turns Agent work cheap

DeepSeek V4 Flash Is Repricing the Post-Coding-Plan Era

Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2: a one-endpoint test

oMLX 0.4.5.dev1 speeds up GLM-5.2 and MiniMax M3

GLM-5.2 tops open AI rankings on Huawei chips

GLM-5.2 beats GPT-5.5 on coding tests

更多比較

DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Opus 4.5 DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 4 Scout DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen 3.6 DeepSeek R1 vs Kimi K2.7 Code DeepSeek R1 vs MiniMax H3 DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 4 Maverick DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-5.3-Codex GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6 GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code GLM-5.2 vs MiniMax H3 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.3-Codex