← 全部模型

GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6

Qwen 3.6 在 2 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

平手

價格較低

Qwen 3.6

速度較快

平手

詳細比較

類別	GLM-5.2	Qwen 3.6
Provider	Z.ai	Alibaba
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	$1.4	$0.2 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)	$4.4	$0.8 勝出
Arena ELO	N/A	N/A
Coding	N/A	N/A
Reasoning	N/A	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	N/A
Open Source	Yes	Yes

常見問題

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or Qwen 3.6?

Qwen 3.6 is approximately 83% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window?

GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while Qwen 3.6 supports 128K.

Is GLM-5.2 or Qwen 3.6 open source?

GLM-5.2 is open source. Qwen 3.6 is open source.

相關文章

Qwen3.8-Max proves that agentic work is the real frontier

Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2: a one-endpoint test

oMLX 0.4.5.dev1 speeds up GLM-5.2 and MiniMax M3

GLM-5.2 tops open AI rankings on Huawei chips

GLM-5.2 beats GPT-5.5 on coding tests

QwenPaw Rebrands as a Personal AI Assistant

更多比較

GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code GLM-5.2 vs MiniMax H3 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.3-Codex GLM-5.2 vs Gemma 4 Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5 Qwen 3.6 vs Llama 4 Scout Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen 3.6 vs Kimi K2.7 Code Qwen 3.6 vs MiniMax H3 Qwen 3.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick Qwen 3.6 vs GPT-5.3-Codex Qwen 3.6 vs Gemma 4