← 全部模型

GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6

Qwen 3.6 在 2 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

平手

價格較低

Qwen 3.6

速度較快

平手

詳細比較

類別	GLM-5.2	Qwen 3.6
Provider	Z.ai	Alibaba
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	$3	$0.2 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)	$80	$0.8 勝出
Arena ELO	N/A	N/A
Coding	N/A	N/A
Reasoning	N/A	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	N/A
Open Source	Yes	Yes

常見問題

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or Qwen 3.6?

Qwen 3.6 is approximately 99% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window?

GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while Qwen 3.6 supports 128K.

Is GLM-5.2 or Qwen 3.6 open source?

GLM-5.2 is open source. Qwen 3.6 is open source.

相關文章

GLM-5.2开源：1M上下文冲刺长程任务

GLM-5.2把前沿模型变成可用工具

QwenPaw Rebrands as a Personal AI Assistant

Kimi K2.6 and Qwen 3.6 Narrow the Gap

Qwen3.6-27B opens a smaller, sharper path to coding

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: 35B Open Source Model Release

更多比較

GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4o GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek V3.2 Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5 Qwen 3.6 vs Llama 4 Scout Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen 3.6 vs GPT-4o Qwen 3.6 vs DeepSeek R1 Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.6 Qwen 3.6 vs DeepSeek V3.2