← 全部模型

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

DeepSeek V3.2 在 4 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

DeepSeek V3.2

價格較低

DeepSeek V3.2

速度較快

DeepSeek V3.2

詳細比較

類別	DeepSeek V3.2	Gemini 3.5 Flash
Provider	DeepSeek	Google
Context Window	128K	1M 勝出
Input Price ($/1M)	$0.27 勝出	$1.5
Output Price ($/1M)	$1.1 勝出	$9
Arena ELO	1380 勝出	N/A
Coding	unknown	N/A
Reasoning	unknown	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	~80 t/s 勝出	N/A
Open Source	Yes	No

常見問題

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 is approximately 87% cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash per million tokens.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while Gemini 3.5 Flash scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V3.2 supports 128K context, while Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1M.

Is DeepSeek V3.2 or Gemini 3.5 Flash open source?

DeepSeek V3.2 is open source. Gemini 3.5 Flash is proprietary.

相關文章

Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…

Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap

Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line

Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move

Gemini 3.5 Flash lets you script computer use

DeepSeek’s low-cost chatbot changed AI pricing

更多比較

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 Scout DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen 3.6 DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Fable 5 DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5 Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen 3.6 Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Fable 5 Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code Gemini 3.5 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash