← 全部模型

DeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM-5.2

DeepSeek V3.2 在 4 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

DeepSeek V3.2

價格較低

DeepSeek V3.2

速度較快

DeepSeek V3.2

詳細比較

類別	DeepSeek V3.2	GLM-5.2
Provider	DeepSeek	Z.ai
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	$0.14 勝出	$3
Output Price ($/1M)	$0.42 勝出	$80
Arena ELO	1380 勝出	N/A
Coding	unknown	N/A
Reasoning	unknown	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	~80 t/s 勝出	N/A
Open Source	Yes	Yes

常見問題

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or GLM-5.2?

DeepSeek V3.2 is approximately 99% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 or GLM-5.2?

DeepSeek V3.2 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while GLM-5.2 scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V3.2 supports 128K context, while GLM-5.2 supports 128K.

Is DeepSeek V3.2 or GLM-5.2 open source?

DeepSeek V3.2 is open source. GLM-5.2 is open source.

相關文章

GLM-5.2开源：1M上下文冲刺长程任务

GLM-5.2把前沿模型变成可用工具

5 steps to connect Codex with DeepSeek

Why Claude Code Should Use DeepSeek v4 for 1M Context

Why DeepSeek V4 plus Claude Code is the wrong way to judge coding mod…

Will NVIDIA Stock Recover After DeepSeek?

更多比較

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 Scout DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen 3.6 DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-4o DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek R1 DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6 GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4o GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6