← 全部模型

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K3

DeepSeek V3.2 在 4 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

DeepSeek V3.2

價格較低

DeepSeek V3.2

速度較快

DeepSeek V3.2

詳細比較

類別DeepSeek V3.2Kimi K3
ProviderDeepSeek Moonshot AI
Context Window128K 128K
Input Price ($/1M)$0.27 勝出$0.6
Output Price ($/1M)$1.1 勝出$2.5
Arena ELO1380 勝出N/A
Codingunknown N/A
Reasoningunknown N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)~80 t/s 勝出N/A
Open SourceYes Yes

常見問題

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Kimi K3?

DeepSeek V3.2 is approximately 56% cheaper than Kimi K3 per million tokens.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 or Kimi K3?

DeepSeek V3.2 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while Kimi K3 scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V3.2 supports 128K context, while Kimi K3 supports 128K.

Is DeepSeek V3.2 or Kimi K3 open source?

DeepSeek V3.2 is open source. Kimi K3 is open source.

相關文章

Kimi K3 Benchmark Evaluation Guide for Coding Agents

Kimi K3 Proves Intelligence Still Costs Too Much

Kimi K3 could pressure the middle tier of AI models

Kimi K3 turns model hype into harness work

Kimi API quickstart adds K2.7 Code and Highspeed

Kimi K2.6 turns a prompt into brand sites

更多比較

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Fable 5Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.5Kimi K3 vs Llama 4 ScoutKimi K3 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.6Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeKimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashKimi K3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Kimi K3 vs Claude Fable 5