← 全部模型

DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiniMax M3

DeepSeek V3.2 在 4 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

DeepSeek V3.2

價格較低

DeepSeek V3.2

速度較快

DeepSeek V3.2

詳細比較

類別DeepSeek V3.2MiniMax M3
ProviderDeepSeek MiniMax
Context Window128K 1M 勝出
Input Price ($/1M)$0.14 勝出N/A
Output Price ($/1M)$0.42 勝出N/A
Arena ELO1380 勝出N/A
Codingunknown N/A
Reasoningunknown N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)~80 t/s 勝出N/A
Open SourceYes Yes

常見問題

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 or MiniMax M3?

DeepSeek V3.2 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while MiniMax M3 scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V3.2 supports 128K context, while MiniMax M3 supports 1M.

Is DeepSeek V3.2 or MiniMax M3 open source?

DeepSeek V3.2 is open source. MiniMax M3 is open source.

相關文章

MiniMax M3 Proves Open-Weight Can Still Win on Coding

5 steps to connect Codex with DeepSeek

MiniMax M3: 中国首个三合一开源模型

Why MiniMax M3 matters more than another long-context model

MiniMax M3 让工程师工作流更像代理

7 MiniMax models for agentic apps

更多比較

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-4oDeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek R1DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 MaverickMiniMax M3 vs Claude Opus 4.5MiniMax M3 vs Llama 4 ScoutMiniMax M3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6MiniMax M3 vs Claude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M3 vs Claude Opus 4.6MiniMax M3 vs GPT-4oMiniMax M3 vs DeepSeek R1MiniMax M3 vs Llama 4 Maverick