DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-4o
兩個模型整體表現接近
Arena ELO
GPT-4o
價格較低
DeepSeek V4 Flash
速度較快
GPT-4o
詳細比較
| 類別 | DeepSeek V4 Flash | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.14 勝出 | $2.5 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $0.28 勝出 | $10 |
| Arena ELO | N/A | 1285 勝出 |
| Coding | N/A | 30.8% SWE-bench |
| Reasoning | N/A | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | ~100 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or GPT-4o?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is approximately 97% cheaper than GPT-4o per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash or GPT-4o?
DeepSeek V4 Flash scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench.
Which has a larger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 128K context, while GPT-4o supports 128K.
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or GPT-4o open source?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is open source. GPT-4o is proprietary.
相關文章
更多比較
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GLM-5.2DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek R1DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.6GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-4o vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o vs GLM-5.2GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6GPT-4o vs DeepSeek R1GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.6