DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-4o
兩個模型整體表現接近
Arena ELO
GPT-4o
價格較低
DeepSeek V4 Flash
速度較快
GPT-4o
詳細比較
| 類別 | DeepSeek V4 Flash | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.14 勝出 | $2.5 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $0.28 勝出 | $10 |
| Arena ELO | N/A | 1340 勝出 |
| Coding | N/A | 30.8% SWE-bench |
| Reasoning | N/A | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | ~100 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or GPT-4o?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is approximately 97% cheaper than GPT-4o per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash or GPT-4o?
DeepSeek V4 Flash scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench.
Which has a larger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 128K context, while GPT-4o supports 128K.
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or GPT-4o open source?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is open source. GPT-4o is proprietary.
相關文章
DeepSeek V4 Flash turns Agent work cheap
DeepSeek V4 Flash Is Repricing the Post-Coding-Plan Era
DeepSeek’s low-cost chatbot changed AI pricing
5 steps to connect Codex with DeepSeek
Why Claude Code Should Use DeepSeek v4 for 1M Context
Why DeepSeek V4 plus Claude Code is the wrong way to judge coding mod…
更多比較
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiniMax H3DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 MaverickDeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.3-CodexGPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-4o vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6GPT-4o vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-4o vs MiniMax H3GPT-4o vs Llama 4 MaverickGPT-4o vs GPT-5.3-Codex