DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen 3 235B
兩個模型整體表現接近
Arena ELO
Qwen 3 235B
價格較低
DeepSeek V4 Flash
速度較快
Qwen 3 235B
詳細比較
| 類別 | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen 3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.14 勝出 | $0.86 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $0.28 勝出 | $2 |
| Arena ELO | N/A | 1422 勝出 |
| Coding | N/A | 70.7% LiveCodeBench |
| Reasoning | N/A | 2056 CodeForces ELO |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | ~65 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen 3 235B?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is approximately 85% cheaper than Qwen 3 235B per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen 3 235B?
DeepSeek V4 Flash scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench.
Which has a larger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 128K context, while Qwen 3 235B supports 128K.
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen 3 235B open source?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is open source. Qwen 3 235B is open source.
相關文章
更多比較
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GLM-5.2DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-4oDeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek R1Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3 235B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs GLM-5.2Qwen 3 235B vs Qwen 3.6Qwen 3 235B vs GPT-4oQwen 3 235B vs DeepSeek R1