← 全部模型

Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Gemma 4

兩個模型整體表現接近

Arena ELO

平手

價格較低

平手

速度較快

平手

詳細比較

類別	Gemini 3.2 Flash	Gemma 4
Provider	Google	Google
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	N/A	N/A
Output Price ($/1M)	N/A	N/A
Arena ELO	N/A	N/A
Coding	N/A	N/A
Reasoning	N/A	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	N/A
Open Source	No	Yes

常見問題

Which has a larger context window?

Gemini 3.2 Flash supports 128K context, while Gemma 4 supports 128K.

Is Gemini 3.2 Flash or Gemma 4 open source?

Gemini 3.2 Flash is proprietary. Gemma 4 is open source.

相關文章

Google Home Speaker preorder puts Gemini first

Google’s $99 speaker turns home into Gemini chat

Apple’s Gemini-Powered Siri Raises SEO Stakes

Claude vs GPT vs Gemini: Coding Benchmark Leaderboard

DeepMind把Gemini装进Atlas后，机器人更像会思考了

DiffusionGemma’s transparency problem, measured

更多比較

Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GLM-5.2 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Qwen 3.6 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GPT-4o Gemini 3.2 Flash vs DeepSeek R1 Gemma 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5 Gemma 4 vs Llama 4 Scout Gemma 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Gemma 4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Gemma 4 vs GLM-5.2 Gemma 4 vs Qwen 3.6 Gemma 4 vs GPT-4o Gemma 4 vs DeepSeek R1