← 全部模型

Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GPT-5.3-Codex

GPT-5.3-Codex 在 2 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

平手

價格較低

GPT-5.3-Codex

速度較快

平手

詳細比較

類別	Gemini 3.2 Flash	GPT-5.3-Codex
Provider	Google	OpenAI
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	N/A	$1.75 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)	N/A	$14 勝出
Arena ELO	N/A	N/A
Coding	N/A	N/A
Reasoning	N/A	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	N/A
Open Source	No	No

常見問題

Which has a larger context window?

Gemini 3.2 Flash supports 128K context, while GPT-5.3-Codex supports 128K.

Is Gemini 3.2 Flash or GPT-5.3-Codex open source?

Gemini 3.2 Flash is proprietary. GPT-5.3-Codex is proprietary.

相關文章

Google Home Speaker preorder puts Gemini first

Google’s $99 speaker turns home into Gemini chat

Apple’s Gemini-Powered Siri Raises SEO Stakes

Claude vs GPT vs Gemini: Coding Benchmark Leaderboard

DeepMind把Gemini装进Atlas后，机器人更像会思考了

Google launches Gemini 3.5 Live Translate audio model

更多比較

Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GLM-5.2 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Qwen 3.6 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GPT-4o Gemini 3.2 Flash vs DeepSeek R1 GPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Opus 4.5 GPT-5.3-Codex vs Llama 4 Scout GPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GPT-5.3-Codex vs GLM-5.2 GPT-5.3-Codex vs Qwen 3.6 GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-4o GPT-5.3-Codex vs DeepSeek R1