← 全部模型

Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GPT-4.1 Nano

GPT-4.1 Nano 在 2 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

平手

價格較低

GPT-4.1 Nano

速度較快

平手

詳細比較

類別Gemini 3.2 FlashGPT-4.1 Nano
ProviderGoogle OpenAI
Context Window128K 128K
Input Price ($/1M)N/A $0.1 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)N/A $0.4 勝出
Arena ELON/A N/A
CodingN/A N/A
ReasoningN/A N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)N/A N/A
Open SourceNo No

常見問題

Which has a larger context window?

Gemini 3.2 Flash supports 128K context, while GPT-4.1 Nano supports 128K.

Is Gemini 3.2 Flash or GPT-4.1 Nano open source?

Gemini 3.2 Flash is proprietary. GPT-4.1 Nano is proprietary.

相關文章

Google Home Speaker preorder puts Gemini first

Google’s $99 speaker turns home into Gemini chat

Apple’s Gemini-Powered Siri Raises SEO Stakes

Claude vs GPT vs Gemini: Coding Benchmark Leaderboard

DeepMind把Gemini装进Atlas后，机器人更像会思考了

Google launches Gemini 3.5 Live Translate audio model

更多比較

Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Llama 4 ScoutGemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GLM-5.2Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Qwen 3.6Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GPT-4oGemini 3.2 Flash vs DeepSeek R1GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM-5.2GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen 3.6GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-4oGPT-4.1 Nano vs DeepSeek R1