← 全部模型

Gemma 4 vs GLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 在 2 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

平手

價格較低

GLM-5.2

速度較快

平手

詳細比較

類別	Gemma 4	GLM-5.2
Provider	Google	Z.ai
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	N/A	$3 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)	N/A	$80 勝出
Arena ELO	N/A	N/A
Coding	N/A	N/A
Reasoning	N/A	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	N/A
Open Source	Yes	Yes

常見問題

Which has a larger context window?

Gemma 4 supports 128K context, while GLM-5.2 supports 128K.

Is Gemma 4 or GLM-5.2 open source?

Gemma 4 is open source. GLM-5.2 is open source.

相關文章

GLM-5.2开源：1M上下文冲刺长程任务

DiffusionGemma’s transparency problem, measured

Gemma 4 brings 256K context to open models

GLM-5.2把前沿模型变成可用工具

Gemma 4 12B: Specs, Benchmarks & How to Run It Locally

Gemma 4 assistant models get faster draft tokens

更多比較

Gemma 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5 Gemma 4 vs Llama 4 Scout Gemma 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Gemma 4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Gemma 4 vs Qwen 3.6 Gemma 4 vs GPT-4o Gemma 4 vs DeepSeek R1 Gemma 4 vs Claude Opus 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6 GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4o GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6