← 全部模型

GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4.1 Nano

GPT-4.1 Nano 在 2 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

平手

價格較低

GPT-4.1 Nano

速度較快

平手

詳細比較

類別	GLM-5.2	GPT-4.1 Nano
Provider	Z.ai	OpenAI
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	$3	$0.1 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)	$80	$0.4 勝出
Arena ELO	N/A	N/A
Coding	N/A	N/A
Reasoning	N/A	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	N/A
Open Source	Yes	No

常見問題

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or GPT-4.1 Nano?

GPT-4.1 Nano is approximately 99% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window?

GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while GPT-4.1 Nano supports 128K.

Is GLM-5.2 or GPT-4.1 Nano open source?

GLM-5.2 is open source. GPT-4.1 Nano is proprietary.

相關文章

GLM-5.2开源：1M上下文冲刺长程任务

GLM-5.2把前沿模型变成可用工具

Copilot Studio shifts to GPT-4.1 by default

更多比較

GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6 GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4o GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6 GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Opus 4.5 GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 Scout GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen 3.6 GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-4o GPT-4.1 Nano vs DeepSeek R1 GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Opus 4.6