← 全部模型

GLM-5.2 vs Grok 4

Grok 4 在 4 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

Grok 4

價格較低

GLM-5.2

速度較快

Grok 4

詳細比較

類別	GLM-5.2	Grok 4
Provider	Z.ai	xAI
Context Window	128K	256K 勝出
Input Price ($/1M)	$3 勝出	$5
Output Price ($/1M)	$80	$25 勝出
Arena ELO	N/A	1340 勝出
Coding	N/A	unknown
Reasoning	N/A	unknown
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	~45 t/s 勝出
Open Source	Yes	No

常見問題

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or Grok 4?

Grok 4 is approximately 64% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or Grok 4?

GLM-5.2 scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while Grok 4 scores unknown.

Which has a larger context window?

GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while Grok 4 supports 256K.

Is GLM-5.2 or Grok 4 open source?

GLM-5.2 is open source. Grok 4 is proprietary.

相關文章

GLM-5.2开源：1M上下文冲刺长程任务

The Pentagon should not use Grok for wartime targeting

Grok’s latest controversies are now a regulation story

GLM-5.2把前沿模型变成可用工具

SpaceX’s IPO Should Not Wash Away Grok’s Safety Failures

5 Grok updates that change how I code

更多比較

GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6 GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4o GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6 Grok 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5 Grok 4 vs Llama 4 Scout Grok 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Grok 4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Grok 4 vs Qwen 3.6 Grok 4 vs GPT-4o Grok 4 vs DeepSeek R1 Grok 4 vs Claude Opus 4.6