DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads in 5 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Cheaper
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Faster
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Detailed Comparison
| Category | DeepSeek R1 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Context Window | 128K | 1M WIN |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.55 | $0.1 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $2.19 | $0.4 WIN |
| Arena ELO | 1310 | 1492 WIN |
| Coding | unknown | unknown |
| Reasoning | #1 Math & Coding Arena | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~45 t/s | ~200 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is approximately 82% cheaper than DeepSeek R1 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek R1 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
DeepSeek R1 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores unknown.
Which has a larger context window?
DeepSeek R1 supports 128K context, while Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite supports 1M.
Is DeepSeek R1 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite open source?
DeepSeek R1 is open source. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is proprietary.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite ranks higher with ELO 1492 vs 1310.
Related Articles
Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…
Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap
Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line
Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move
Gemini 3.5 Flash lets you script computer use
DeepSeek’s low-cost chatbot changed AI pricing