GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout leads in 4 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Tie
Cheaper
Llama 4 Scout
Faster
Llama 4 Scout
Detailed Comparison
| Category | GPT-4.1 Nano | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Context Window | 128K | 10M WIN |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.1 | $0.08 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $0.4 | $0.3 WIN |
| Arena ELO | N/A | N/A |
| Coding | N/A | unknown |
| Reasoning | N/A | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | ~90 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is approximately 24% cheaper than GPT-4.1 Nano per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, GPT-4.1 Nano or Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4.1 Nano scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while Llama 4 Scout scores unknown.
Which has a larger context window?
GPT-4.1 Nano supports 128K context, while Llama 4 Scout supports 10M.
Is GPT-4.1 Nano or Llama 4 Scout open source?
GPT-4.1 Nano is proprietary. Llama 4 Scout is open source.
Related Articles
llama.cpp vs vLLM: Choosing the right local LLM engine
Rootly benchmark: Llama 4 trails coding models
llama.cpp’s latest release proves the project still wins by tightenin…
Ollama is becoming the default local AI layer
Bedrock makes Llama a practical enterprise default, not a side project
Ollama is the best free AI path in 2026 for real work
More Comparisons
GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM-5.2GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen 3.6GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-4oGPT-4.1 Nano vs DeepSeek R1GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Opus 4.6Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4.5Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 4.5Llama 4 Scout vs GLM-5.2Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen 3.6Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-4oLlama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek R1Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4.6