DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen 3 235B
Qwen 3 235B 在 3 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
Qwen 3 235B
價格較低
DeepSeek R1
速度較快
Qwen 3 235B
詳細比較
| 類別 | DeepSeek R1 | Qwen 3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.55 勝出 | $0.86 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $2.19 | $2 勝出 |
| Arena ELO | 1310 | 1422 勝出 |
| Coding | unknown | 70.7% LiveCodeBench |
| Reasoning | #1 Math & Coding Arena | 2056 CodeForces ELO |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~45 t/s | ~65 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or Qwen 3 235B?
DeepSeek R1 is approximately 4% cheaper than Qwen 3 235B per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek R1 or Qwen 3 235B?
DeepSeek R1 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench.
Which has a larger context window?
DeepSeek R1 supports 128K context, while Qwen 3 235B supports 128K.
Is DeepSeek R1 or Qwen 3 235B open source?
DeepSeek R1 is open source. Qwen 3 235B is open source.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Qwen 3 235B ranks higher with ELO 1422 vs 1310.
相關文章
更多比較
DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek R1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Fable 5DeepSeek R1 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3 235B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Qwen 3.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Fable 5Qwen 3 235B vs Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen 3 235B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash