← 全部模型

DeepSeek V4 vs GLM-5.2

DeepSeek V4 在 2 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

平手

價格較低

DeepSeek V4

速度較快

平手

詳細比較

類別	DeepSeek V4	GLM-5.2
Provider	DeepSeek	Z.ai
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	$0.435 勝出	$3
Output Price ($/1M)	$0.87 勝出	$80
Arena ELO	N/A	N/A
Coding	N/A	N/A
Reasoning	N/A	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	N/A
Open Source	Yes	Yes

常見問題

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 or GLM-5.2?

DeepSeek V4 is approximately 98% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V4 supports 128K context, while GLM-5.2 supports 128K.

Is DeepSeek V4 or GLM-5.2 open source?

DeepSeek V4 is open source. GLM-5.2 is open source.

相關文章

GLM-5.2开源：1M上下文冲刺长程任务

GLM-5.2把前沿模型变成可用工具

5 steps to connect Codex with DeepSeek

Why Claude Code Should Use DeepSeek v4 for 1M Context

Why DeepSeek V4 plus Claude Code is the wrong way to judge coding mod…

Will NVIDIA Stock Recover After DeepSeek?

更多比較

DeepSeek V4 vs Claude Opus 4.5 DeepSeek V4 vs Llama 4 Scout DeepSeek V4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 DeepSeek V4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 DeepSeek V4 vs Qwen 3.6 DeepSeek V4 vs GPT-4o DeepSeek V4 vs DeepSeek R1 DeepSeek V4 vs Claude Opus 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6 GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4o GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6