← 全部模型

Gemini 3.2 Flash vs GPT-4o

GPT-4o 在 4 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

GPT-4o

價格較低

GPT-4o

速度較快

GPT-4o

詳細比較

類別	Gemini 3.2 Flash	GPT-4o
Provider	Google	OpenAI
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	N/A	$2.5 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)	N/A	$10 勝出
Arena ELO	N/A	1340 勝出
Coding	N/A	30.8% SWE-bench
Reasoning	N/A	unknown
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	~100 t/s 勝出
Open Source	No	No

常見問題

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.2 Flash or GPT-4o?

Gemini 3.2 Flash scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench.

Which has a larger context window?

Gemini 3.2 Flash supports 128K context, while GPT-4o supports 128K.

Is Gemini 3.2 Flash or GPT-4o open source?

Gemini 3.2 Flash is proprietary. GPT-4o is proprietary.

相關文章

Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…

Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap

Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line

Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move

Gemini 3.5 Flash lets you script computer use

Xcode 26.6 Adds Gemini to Apple’s AI Coding Stack

更多比較

Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Qwen 3.6 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Fable 5 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code Gemini 3.2 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5 GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6 GPT-4o vs Claude Fable 5 GPT-4o vs Kimi K2.7 Code GPT-4o vs DeepSeek V4 Flash