← 全部模型

GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4o

兩個模型整體表現接近

Arena ELO

GPT-4o

價格較低

GLM-5.2

速度較快

GPT-4o

詳細比較

類別	GLM-5.2	GPT-4o
Provider	Z.ai	OpenAI
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	$1.4 勝出	$2.5
Output Price ($/1M)	$4.4 勝出	$10
Arena ELO	N/A	1340 勝出
Coding	N/A	30.8% SWE-bench
Reasoning	N/A	unknown
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	~100 t/s 勝出
Open Source	Yes	No

常見問題

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or GPT-4o?

GLM-5.2 is approximately 54% cheaper than GPT-4o per million tokens.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or GPT-4o?

GLM-5.2 scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench.

Which has a larger context window?

GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while GPT-4o supports 128K.

Is GLM-5.2 or GPT-4o open source?

GLM-5.2 is open source. GPT-4o is proprietary.

相關文章

Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2: a one-endpoint test

oMLX 0.4.5.dev1 speeds up GLM-5.2 and MiniMax M3

GLM-5.2 tops open AI rankings on Huawei chips

GLM-5.2 beats GPT-5.5 on coding tests

更多比較

GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6 GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code GLM-5.2 vs MiniMax H3 GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.3-Codex GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5 GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6 GPT-4o vs Kimi K2.7 Code GPT-4o vs MiniMax H3 GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Maverick GPT-4o vs GPT-5.3-Codex