Grok 4.5 vs Qwen 3 235B
Qwen 3 235B 在 4 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
Qwen 3 235B
價格較低
Qwen 3 235B
速度較快
Qwen 3 235B
詳細比較
| 類別 | Grok 4.5 | Qwen 3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | N/A | $0.86 勝出 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | N/A | $2 勝出 |
| Arena ELO | N/A | 1422 勝出 |
| Coding | N/A | 70.7% LiveCodeBench |
| Reasoning | N/A | 2056 CodeForces ELO |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | ~65 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
常見問題
Which is better for coding, Grok 4.5 or Qwen 3 235B?
Grok 4.5 scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench.
Which has a larger context window?
Grok 4.5 supports 128K context, while Qwen 3 235B supports 128K.
Is Grok 4.5 or Qwen 3 235B open source?
Grok 4.5 is proprietary. Qwen 3 235B is open source.
相關文章
Grok 4.5 enters private beta at Tesla and SpaceX
Grok Imagine 1.5 turns prompts into 720p video
Grok AI’s price surge is a liquidity warning, not a thesis
Grok Build Adds /goal for Autonomous Coding
The Pentagon should not use Grok for wartime targeting
Grok’s latest controversies are now a regulation story
更多比較
Grok 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.5Grok 4.5 vs Llama 4 ScoutGrok 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Grok 4.5 vs Qwen 3.6Grok 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5Grok 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGrok 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3 235B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Qwen 3.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Fable 5Qwen 3 235B vs Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen 3 235B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash