Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Claude Opus 4.5 leads in 5 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.5
Cheaper
Claude Opus 4.5
Faster
Claude Opus 4.5
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 200K WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 WIN | N/A |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 WIN | N/A |
| Arena ELO | 1380 WIN | N/A |
| Coding | 80.9% SWE-bench | N/A |
| Reasoning | unknown | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~35 t/s WIN | N/A |
| Open Source | No | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Claude Opus 4.5 scores 80.9% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while GPT-5.6 Luna scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K context, while GPT-5.6 Luna supports 128K.
Is Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Luna open source?
Claude Opus 4.5 is proprietary. GPT-5.6 Luna is proprietary.
Related Articles
Anthropic’s California deal makes Claude the default public-sector AI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 narrows the SRE gap
GLM 5.2 beats Claude in Semgrep’s IDOR test
Claude Code turns agent setup into terminal work
Anthropic Accuses Alibaba of Massive Claude Distillation
OpenAI narrows GPT-5.6 rollout after U.S. request
More Comparisons
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-5.2Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.6 Luna vs GLM-5.2GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen 3.6GPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Fable 5GPT-5.6 Luna vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-5.6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4 Flash