← All Models

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4.5

Claude Opus 4.6 leads in 5 of 8 categories

Arena ELO

Claude Opus 4.6

Cheaper

Claude Opus 4.6

Faster

Claude Opus 4.6

Detailed Comparison

CategoryClaude Opus 4.6Grok 4.5
ProviderAnthropic xAI
Context Window1M WIN128K
Input Price ($/1M)$5 WINN/A
Output Price ($/1M)$25 WINN/A
Arena ELO1549 WINN/A
Coding80.8% SWE-bench N/A
Reasoning65.4% Terminal-Bench N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)~40 t/s WINN/A
Open SourceNo No

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or Grok 4.5?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while Grok 4.5 scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while Grok 4.5 supports 128K.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 or Grok 4.5 open source?

Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. Grok 4.5 is proprietary.

Related Articles

Claude Fable 5 Gets Access Back in the US

Claude Design setup for synced prototypes

California’s Claude deal cuts agency AI costs in half

California’s Claude deal puts AI inside state offices

Anthropic’s California deal makes Claude the default public-sector AI

Claude Sonnet 4.6 narrows the SRE gap

More Comparisons

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.5Grok 4.5 vs Llama 4 ScoutGrok 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Grok 4.5 vs Qwen 3.6Grok 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5Grok 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGrok 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash