Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-5.2
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads in 5 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Faster
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GLM-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | |
| Context Window | 1M WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $1.25 WIN | $3 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $10 WIN | $80 |
| Arena ELO | 1458 WIN | N/A |
| Coding | 75.6% LiveCodeBench | N/A |
| Reasoning | 84.6% GPQA Diamond | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~60 t/s WIN | N/A |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or GLM-5.2?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is approximately 86% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro or GLM-5.2?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 75.6% LiveCodeBench on coding benchmarks, while GLM-5.2 scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M context, while GLM-5.2 supports 128K.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or GLM-5.2 open source?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is proprietary. GLM-5.2 is open source.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 4 ScoutGemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3.6Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4oGemini 2.5 Pro vs DeepSeek R1Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.6GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutGLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4oGLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6