DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-4o
DeepSeek V3.2 在 3 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
DeepSeek V3.2
價格較低
DeepSeek V3.2
速度較快
GPT-4o
詳細比較
| 類別 | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.27 勝出 | $2.5 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $1.1 勝出 | $10 |
| Arena ELO | 1380 勝出 | 1340 |
| Coding | unknown | 30.8% SWE-bench |
| Reasoning | unknown | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~80 t/s | ~100 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or GPT-4o?
DeepSeek V3.2 is approximately 89% cheaper than GPT-4o per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 or GPT-4o?
DeepSeek V3.2 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench.
Which has a larger context window?
DeepSeek V3.2 supports 128K context, while GPT-4o supports 128K.
Is DeepSeek V3.2 or GPT-4o open source?
DeepSeek V3.2 is open source. GPT-4o is proprietary.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
DeepSeek V3.2 ranks higher with ELO 1380 vs 1340.
相關文章
更多比較
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashGPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-4o vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6GPT-4o vs Claude Fable 5GPT-4o vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-4o vs DeepSeek V4 Flash