DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen 3 235B
DeepSeek V3.2 在 3 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
Qwen 3 235B
價格較低
DeepSeek V3.2
速度較快
DeepSeek V3.2
詳細比較
| 類別 | DeepSeek V3.2 | Qwen 3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.27 勝出 | $0.86 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $1.1 勝出 | $2 |
| Arena ELO | 1380 | 1422 勝出 |
| Coding | unknown | 70.7% LiveCodeBench |
| Reasoning | unknown | 2056 CodeForces ELO |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~80 t/s 勝出 | ~65 t/s |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Qwen 3 235B?
DeepSeek V3.2 is approximately 52% cheaper than Qwen 3 235B per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 or Qwen 3 235B?
DeepSeek V3.2 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench.
Which has a larger context window?
DeepSeek V3.2 supports 128K context, while Qwen 3 235B supports 128K.
Is DeepSeek V3.2 or Qwen 3 235B open source?
DeepSeek V3.2 is open source. Qwen 3 235B is open source.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Qwen 3 235B ranks higher with ELO 1422 vs 1380.
相關文章
更多比較
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3 235B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Qwen 3.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Fable 5Qwen 3 235B vs Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen 3 235B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash