Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3 235B
Qwen 3 235B 在 4 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
Qwen 3 235B
價格較低
Qwen 3 235B
速度較快
Qwen 3 235B
詳細比較
| 類別 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen 3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Context Window | 1M 勝出 | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $1.25 | $0.86 勝出 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $10 | $2 勝出 |
| Arena ELO | 1360 | 1422 勝出 |
| Coding | 75.6% LiveCodeBench | 70.7% LiveCodeBench |
| Reasoning | 84.6% GPQA Diamond | 2056 CodeForces ELO |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~60 t/s | ~65 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 235B?
Qwen 3 235B is approximately 75% cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 235B?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 75.6% LiveCodeBench on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench.
Which has a larger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M context, while Qwen 3 235B supports 128K.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 235B open source?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is proprietary. Qwen 3 235B is open source.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Qwen 3 235B ranks higher with ELO 1422 vs 1360.
相關文章
Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…
Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap
Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line
Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move
Gemini 3.5 Flash lets you script computer use
Xcode 26.6 Adds Gemini to Apple’s AI Coding Stack
更多比較
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 4 ScoutGemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3.6Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Fable 5Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGemini 2.5 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3 235B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Qwen 3.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Fable 5Qwen 3 235B vs Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen 3 235B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash