GPT-4o vs Qwen 3 235B
Qwen 3 235B 在 3 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
Qwen 3 235B
價格較低
Qwen 3 235B
速度較快
GPT-4o
詳細比較
| 類別 | GPT-4o | Qwen 3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $2.5 | $0.86 勝出 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $10 | $2 勝出 |
| Arena ELO | 1340 | 1422 勝出 |
| Coding | 30.8% SWE-bench | 70.7% LiveCodeBench |
| Reasoning | unknown | 2056 CodeForces ELO |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~100 t/s 勝出 | ~65 t/s |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Qwen 3 235B?
Qwen 3 235B is approximately 77% cheaper than GPT-4o per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, GPT-4o or Qwen 3 235B?
GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench.
Which has a larger context window?
GPT-4o supports 128K context, while Qwen 3 235B supports 128K.
Is GPT-4o or Qwen 3 235B open source?
GPT-4o is proprietary. Qwen 3 235B is open source.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Qwen 3 235B ranks higher with ELO 1422 vs 1340.
相關文章
更多比較
GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-4o vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6GPT-4o vs Claude Fable 5GPT-4o vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-4o vs DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3 235B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Qwen 3.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Fable 5Qwen 3 235B vs Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen 3 235B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash